🏛️ Federal Records
Discover how the ‘Federal Records’ report ensures comprehensive and precise background checks for candidates within Mexico’s federal courts.
🌐 Data Sources you can trust
Section titled “🌐 Data Sources you can trust”Our data comes straight from the heart of Mexico’s judicial proceedings:
- 🏛 **Consejo de la Judicatura Federal (CJF):**A comprehensive overview of all legal processes.
- 🔐 Federal Justice Centers: A robust database of criminal cases.
🌟 Highlights
Section titled “🌟 Highlights”📍In-Depth Verification
Section titled “📍In-Depth Verification”The report meticulously checks multiple types of federal records in Mexico such as:
| 📑 Process type | 📘 Description |
|---|---|
| 📜 Amparos Indirectos | Legal remedies addressing specific acts violating an individual’s constitutional rights. Often the first step in the amparo process. |
| 📚 Amparos Directos | Direct legal challenges made in appellate courts against a final judgment, resolution, or award in civil, administrative, agrarian, labor, or criminal cases. |
| 🖋️ Amparos en Revisión | Review processes initiated when a party disagrees with an indirect amparo decision. Typically handled by the collegiate circuit courts. |
| ⚖️ Causas Penales | Criminal cases or proceedings initiated against individuals for alleged criminal activities. |
| 🗂️ Tocas Penales | Appellate proceedings or files related to criminal cases, where the decision of a lower court is challenged. |
| 📑Procesos civiles o administrativos | Non-criminal records regarding civil or administrative proceedings. |
Dive deeper with our Glossary! 🤓
📍Precision matters
Section titled “📍Precision matters”We ensure precise matches by verifying profile names in the official CJF’s agreement publications:
⚙️ Settings
Section titled “⚙️ Settings”The report can be configured to fit your workflow with the following settings:
⏳ Age of majority
Section titled “⏳ Age of majority”This setting allows the user to set an age before which any records are ignored.
👩⚖️ Autoridad whitelist
Section titled “👩⚖️ Autoridad whitelist”Allows the user to configure our system to ignore records in which a certain authority is listed in the field “autoridad”. This means that any record found in which the authority listed matches a name added to the Autoridad Whitelist setting will be ignored by our system and won’t be considered to reach a FAILED outcome.
🏛️ Court whitelist
Section titled “🏛️ Court whitelist”Allows the user to configure our system to ignore records in which a certain Court is listed in the field “court_id”. This means that any record found in which the court listed matches a name added to the Court Whitelist setting will be ignored by our system and won’t be considered to reach a FAILED outcome.
ℹ️ Info only
Section titled “ℹ️ Info only”By enabling this setting, the report outcome will always be INFO and any records found won’t count to reach a FAILED outcome.
In the following example, the info only setting was enabled, so, even though the Federal Records report found a criminal record for the candidate, the overall outcome of the report was PASSED and the outcome of the report was INFO.
🔢 Max record age
Section titled “🔢 Max record age”This setting allows the user to specify an age limit for records to be considered relevant by the report. Records older than the age set by the user are ignored by the system.
🔡 Name score
Section titled “🔡 Name score”This setting determines the minimum required score for the full name provided in order to return a PASSED outcome. Default value is 1 (100%).
Example: if name_score_min=0.98, it means the full_name provided needs to have at least 98% similarity with the full_name associated with the document_id.
🗞️ Publication type
Section titled “🗞️ Publication type”This setting allows the user to choose which types of records the report should search for: amparo, civil administrativa and penal. It is possible to select all of the options.
✍🏻 Manual review
Section titled “✍🏻 Manual review”When this setting is enabled, the report will be submitted to a thorough manual review performed by our team of legal experts. If disabled, the outcome of the report will rely only on our automated system.
🧐 Our review process
Section titled “🧐 Our review process”Ensuring the accuracy and relevance of our findings is paramount. Here’s our approach 👇🏼:
- 👥 Homonym verification: Filtering out false matches based on name and age.
- 🔍 Process examination: Understanding the nature of each judicial process.
- ⚖️ Legal status: Gauging the candidate’s current or prior legal standing.
- 👩🏻⚖️ Court decision: Checking ongoing investigations or verdicts related to the candidate.
- 📰 News cross-check: Cross-referencing candidate details with relevant news.
🚀 Getting started
Section titled “🚀 Getting started”- 🔑 Log In: Access your Emptor Dashboard.
- 🌎 Choose Country: Select ‘Mexico 🇲🇽’.
- ⚙️ Go Advanced: Opt for ‘advanced mode’.
- 📜 Select Report: Pick ‘Federal Records’.
- 🖊️ Enter Details: Fill in the profile details and kickstart the check.
🤔 Understanding ‘Passed’ & ‘Failed’ outcomes
Section titled “🤔 Understanding ‘Passed’ & ‘Failed’ outcomes”PASSED ✅
Section titled “PASSED ✅”A ‘PASSED’ label indicates that the candidate has no records in the CJF database.
FAILED ❌
Section titled “FAILED ❌”A ‘FAILED’ status suggests that our system has found records (criminal or non-criminal) in which the candidate is a participant.
📘 Any questions? 🤓
If you have any questions, you can still contact us at support@emptor.io and we’ll get back to you in no time!
With the Federal Records report, you’re not just getting data; you’re gaining confidence in your verifications. Trust in Emptor, trust in precision! 💼🌟